# Team Composition Report Template

Copy and fill this template when analyzing team composition using Culture Index profiles.

---

## Team Composition Analysis: [Team Name]

**Date:** [Date]
**Team Size:** [X] members
**Business Stage:** [Growth/Consolidation/Turnaround/Stability]

### Team Roster

| Name | Pattern | A | B | C | D | Primary Role | EU Status |
|------|---------|---|---|---|---|--------------|-----------|
| [Name] | [Pattern] | [pos] | [pos] | [pos] | [pos] | [Gas/Brake/Glue] | [Healthy/Stress/Frustration] |
| [Name] | [Pattern] | [pos] | [pos] | [pos] | [pos] | [Gas/Brake/Glue] | [Healthy/Stress/Frustration] |
| [Name] | [Pattern] | [pos] | [pos] | [pos] | [pos] | [Gas/Brake/Glue] | [Healthy/Stress/Frustration] |

### Gas / Brake / Glue Balance

| Role | Count | Members | Assessment |
|------|-------|---------|------------|
| **Gas** (High A) | [X] | [Names] | [Sufficient/Insufficient/Excess] |
| **Brake** (High D) | [X] | [Names] | [Sufficient/Insufficient/Excess] |
| **Glue** (High B) | [X] | [Names] | [Sufficient/Insufficient/Excess] |

### Balance Assessment

**Current state:**
- Gas (High A): [count] - [assessment]
- Brake (High D): [count] - [assessment]
- Glue (High B): [count] - [assessment]

**For [Business Stage], the team needs:**
- [More/Less/Same] Gas
- [More/Less/Same] Brake
- [More/Less/Same] Glue

### Identified Gaps

| Gap | Impact | Priority |
|-----|--------|----------|
| [Gap 1] | [Impact description] | [High/Medium/Low] |
| [Gap 2] | [Impact description] | [High/Medium/Low] |

### C Trait Distribution

| Pattern | Count | Implication |
|---------|-------|-------------|
| Low C (Fast-paced) | [X] | [implication] |
| High C (Steady) | [X] | [implication] |
| Normative C | [X] | [implication] |

**Assessment:** [Team is mostly fast/steady/mixed - implications]

### A vs B Balance

| Orientation | Count | Members |
|-------------|-------|---------|
| A > B (Task-focused) | [X] | [Names] |
| B > A (People-focused) | [X] | [Names] |
| A ≈ B (Balanced) | [X] | [Names] |

**Assessment:** [Team is task/people/balanced - implications]

### Potential Friction Points

| Person A | Person B | Friction Source | Risk Level |
|----------|----------|-----------------|------------|
| [Name] | [Name] | [trait mismatch] | [High/Medium/Low] |
| [Name] | [Name] | [trait mismatch] | [High/Medium/Low] |

### Hiring Recommendations

*(If gaps exist)*

**Gap 1: [Gap description]**
- Ideal Pattern: [Pattern name]
- A: [High/Low/Normative] - [reason]
- B: [High/Low/Normative] - [reason]
- C: [High/Low/Normative] - [reason]
- D: [High/Low/Normative] - [reason]

### Team Strengths

1. [Strength 1]
2. [Strength 2]
3. [Strength 3]

### Watch Areas

1. [Risk or watch area 1]
2. [Risk or watch area 2]

### Energy Status Overview

| Status | Count | Members |
|--------|-------|---------|
| Healthy (70-130%) | [X] | [Names] |
| Stress (>130%) | [X] | [Names] |
| Frustration (<70%) | [X] | [Names] |

**Team health:** [Overall assessment]

---

*Analysis uses Gas/Brake/Glue framework. Trait positions are relative to each person's arrow. Team composition recommendations depend on business stage and function.*
